Blog

Last semester, I watched a campus budget meeting live on YouTube at 1 a.m. and realized I understood maybe 20 percent of what was happening. People were throwing around acronyms, making “procedural motions,” and somehow that decided if clubs got funding or not. It felt like trying to watch a chess match in a language I did not speak.

So here is the TL;DR: campus politics and student government are not a mysterious club for extroverts and policy nerds. They are just systems run by students, with rules that you can learn, power that you can influence, and tradeoffs you need to understand before you jump in.

What “Campus Politics” Actually Means (Beyond Election Posters)

When people say “campus politics,” they usually mean three overlapping things:

• Student government structures: student union, student council, senate, assembly, cabinet, committees.
• Unofficial power networks: group chats, activist coalitions, club alliances, friends in admin offices.
• Narratives and drama: who “runs” campus, which groups feel ignored, which issues dominate the group chats.

At first it feels chaotic. Different councils, weird titles, blurry lines between “official” power and social capital. Then one day in a lecture you realize: “Oh, this is just a small version of regular politics, with far less experience and sometimes even more ego.”

Campus politics is just power, rules, and relationships, shrunk down to the size of your timetable.

Once you see it that way, it stops feeling mystical and starts feeling like something you can learn and navigate strategically.

How Student Government Is Usually Structured

Every campus is slightly different, but most follow a similar pattern. Think of student government as a small city:

Role / Body	Rough Analogy	What They Actually Do
Student President / Exec Team	Mayor + Cabinet	Public face, sets priorities, meets admin, runs campaigns, manages teams.
Student Senate / Assembly	Parliament / City Council	Debates and votes on policies, passes resolutions, approves budgets.
Treasurer / Finance Committee	Budget Office	Allocates club funding, oversees financial rules.
Judicial / Elections Board	Court / Election Commission	Handles disputes, election rules, constitutional questions.
Standing Committees	Special Policy Teams	Work on topics like housing, academics, mental health, diversity.

You might think: “But do these people actually have power or is this just a resume playground?” Good question.

The real question is not “Does student government matter?” but “Where does it matter, and who actually listens?”

On many campuses, student leaders:

• Control or advise on club funding.
• Nominate students for admin committees (curriculum, conduct, hiring panels).
• Run or influence services like food discounts, mental health campaigns, or transit passes.
• Shape the public narrative about what students care about.

If you want to change something concrete like exam schedules, dining hall hours, or support for startups, you will end up interacting with student government, directly or indirectly.

Why People Actually Get Involved (Beyond the Resume)

The official story is always “giving back to the community.” The reality is more mixed, and that is not a bad thing. People run for positions or show up to meetings for a bunch of reasons:

• Policy curiosity: They want to see how decisions are made and try to tilt them.
• Representation: Their program, cultural group, or faculty feels ignored.
• Ambition: They enjoy leadership, titles, and learning how power works.
• Networking: Student leaders are often the people who start ventures, clubs, or projects later.
• Frustration: A specific issue hit them hard (housing, harassment, accessibility) and they refuse to let it slide.

You should be honest with yourself: what is your main reason? None of these are “wrong,” but your motive shapes how you handle conflict, burnout, and tradeoffs.

If your only reason is prestige, you will quit when the meetings get long and the drama starts.

On the flip side, if your only reason is anger, you risk burning bridges that you might need later to actually change policy.

How Power Really Works: Formal vs Informal Channels

One of the most confusing parts of campus politics is that the official chart of power is not the only story.

The Formal Side

Formal power lives in:

• Constitution and bylaws.
• Budget and funding rules.
• Election rules and official processes.
• Admin-recognized student seats on committees.

These are boring to read, but they matter more than any speech. I remember opening our student union constitution during a dull lecture and realizing: half the stuff people were “debating” was already decided years ago in some subclause.

The most influential person in the room is often the one who actually read the rules.

If you want to navigate campus politics, treat the bylaws like a user manual. Not glamorous, but very practical.

The Informal Side

Then there is informal power:

• Who controls the biggest group chats.
• Which clubs can turn out 200 voters with one message.
• Who admins trust because they are reliable and not chaotic.
• Who writes the Instagram threads that everyone shares.

Sometimes the person with no title has more influence than the official vice chair of some committee, because they control attention and trust.

A simple way to think about it:

Formal Power	Informal Power
Votes in meetings	Ability to mobilize people fast
Control of the agenda	Control of the group chat narrative
Budget signatures	Public pressure, media attention
Access to admin	Peer respect and credibility

Smart student leaders do not pick one side. They use formal rules to create options, and informal networks to build pressure or support when it is needed.

Should You Run for Student Government?

Before you print posters with a slogan you regret in 3 years, pause. Ask some precise questions.

What Are You Actually Trying To Change?

Instead of “I want to represent students,” translate that into one or two concrete focuses:

• “I want to make startup resources visible and accessible to first-years.”
• “I want housing policies to respect students who work part-time or have families.”
• “I want course evaluations to actually lead to changes that students can see.”

If you cannot name one thing you want to push, you are walking into a time sink.

Vague goals make it easy to get absorbed into the machinery and forget why you joined.

Do You Need a Title To Do This?

Sometimes the honest answer is “no.” For example:

• You can start a student founders group without being student president.
• You can run a survey about mental health and publish the results as a club.
• You can write a detailed proposal and bring it to existing representatives.

A position gives you access, voting rights, and a platform. It also gives you:

• Meetings that start 20 minutes late.
• People expecting you to answer long emails about things you do not care about.
• Responsibility for decisions you did not control.

If you only care about one narrow problem, a focused project might beat a broad position.

Can You Actually Handle the Time Cost?

Here is a rough time breakdown that many people underestimate:

Activity	Expected Time / Week (average)
Formal meetings	2-5 hours
Prep (reading agendas, drafting proposals)	1-3 hours
Messages, emails, calls	2-4 hours
Events, office hours, public stuff	1-3 hours

So you are at 6-15 hours per week during busy periods. That is a part-time job. If you are already building a startup or leading a big club, adding a major political role might stretch you too far.

Overcommitting in student government does not just hurt your grades; it can silently kill your other projects.

Be slightly harsh with yourself here. If your bandwidth is limited, a smaller but focused role might give you more impact with less collateral damage.

Understanding Elections: Strategy Without Cynicism

Campus elections can feel like parody politics. Slogans, posters, “debates” with tiny audiences. It is easy to be cynical. But if you step back, you see game design:

Know the Rules of the Game

First, figure out:

• How are votes counted? (simple majority, ranked choice, split by faculty?)
• Who is allowed to vote for your position?
• What are the limits on campaign spending, posters, social media ads?
• Do you run solo or with a slate / team?

People who skip this and rely on vibes usually lose to quieter candidates who studied the rules.

Build a Realistic Base, Not Just Hype

Ask yourself:

• Which groups know you enough to trust you? (clubs, courses, residences, labs)
• Can you visit their meetings or group chats with a short, clear pitch?
• Can you listen to them first, so you are not just broadcasting?

If you want a useful mental model, think of votes like this:

Vote Type	Description	How To Earn It
Core	People who know you personally	Relationships built over time
Persuadable	Students who care about your main issue	Targeted messages, conversations
Incidental	People who pick randomly on voting day	Visibility, name recognition, endorsements

You do not control incidental votes much. Focus on core and persuadable.

Make a Campaign That Is Not Cringe

You will feel pressure to promise everything to everyone. That is a fast path to emptiness. Instead:

• Pick 2 or 3 main commitments that are realistic for your role.
• Write a short, specific explanation of each: what you will do, who you will talk to, what first step looks like.
• Be honest about limits: “I cannot guarantee this changes, but I can guarantee public updates on each step.”

Credibility is more valuable than catchy slogans. You have to govern after you win.

Also, if you are thinking about using spammy tactics (tagging random people, mass DMing strangers with copy-paste messages), reconsider. You will get short-term reach and long-term annoyance.

Surviving Meetings Without Losing Your Mind

The biggest shock for many students is how procedural student government can be. Motions. Amendments. Points of order. It feels theatrical until you map it to simple logic.

Why Procedure Exists

The point is not to sound fancy. The point is to:

• Prevent one loud person from dominating.
• Keep a record of what was decided.
• Give minorities some tools to slow or challenge decisions.

Of course, procedures can be weaponized to stall or confuse. But if you understand them, you can tell when that is happening instead of just feeling lost.

Basic Moves To Learn

Here are a few procedural “moves” that often matter:

• Motion to amend: Change part of a proposal instead of rejecting it fully.
• Motion to refer to committee: Send something for more detailed work before a final vote.
• Point of information: Ask for clarification during debate.
• Point of order: Question whether rules are being followed correctly.
• Call the question: Request to end debate and vote.

If this sounds like another language, that is normal. Skim a simple guide (many campuses use a basic version of parliamentary procedure) and try to connect each term to a practical move you can imagine using.

Preparing Without Overpreparing

The worst thing is showing up to a meeting having no idea what is being discussed. The second worst thing is prepping like it is an exam and burning out.

A middle path:

• Read the agenda once. Highlight any item that involves:
  • Money.
  • Big policy changes.
  • Groups you care about (e.g., student founders, international students).
• For those items, ask yourself:
  • “Who will be happy or unhappy if this passes?”
  • “Do I need to consult anyone before I vote?”
  • “Is there a smaller version of this I could support instead?”

Your job is not to have a hot take on every topic. Your job is to be thoughtful on the ones that matter most.

Conflict, Coalitions, and Not Becoming Cynical

If you stay in campus politics for more than a few weeks, you will see conflict. Some of it will be sincere disagreements. Some of it will be personal. Some of it will be confusing.

Three Kinds of Conflict You Will Meet

• Interest conflict: Groups want different outcomes (e.g., more funding for sports vs more funding for academic clubs).
• Value conflict: People disagree on what is fair, ethical, or safe (e.g., free speech questions, protest tactics).
• Identity conflict: Tensions around race, gender, nationality, class, or other identity lines.

These overlap. If you treat everything like a simple “we just need more information” problem, you will frustrate people who are acting from deep values or heavy experiences.

How To Build Coalitions Without Faking It

Coalitions are groups teaming up to push something through. They can be powerful, but also messy.

To build one that does not feel fake:

• Start with one shared goal, not “we agree on everything.”
• Be explicit about what you cannot promise, so there are no illusions.
• Share credit publicly when something succeeds.
• Keep some channel (group chat, standing meeting) where members can speak openly.

A coalition is not a friendship club. It is a clear agreement: we stand together on X, even if we do not match on Y.

If you pretend total unity, small disagreements can blow up as “betrayals.” Clear boundaries reduce that.

Handling Personal Drama

You will eventually face:

• Rumors about motives.
• Someone misquoting you in a meeting or in chat.
• Accusations that your project is “just for clout.”

You cannot control all of that, but you can:

• Document key conversations and agreements in writing.
• Respond publicly only when needed, and stick to facts.
• Have 2-3 people you trust for honest feedback before you react.

If you find yourself shaping every decision around how it will look in screenshots, campus politics is taking over your mental space. That is the moment to step back.

Working With Administration Without Becoming Their PR Team

Student government sits in a strange spot. You are supposed to represent students, but also work with admin to get things done. That tension is real.

What Admin Usually Wants

In many cases, administrators are trying to balance:

• Legal risk.
• Reputation.
• Budget limits.
• Complicated internal politics you do not see.

They will prefer student partners who are:

• Predictable (no sudden leaks of half-formed plans).
• Prepared (come with data, not only vibes).
• Representative (not just one niche group).

That is not evil by default. But it can pull you toward moderation even when students want sharper action.

How To Hold Admin Accountable

You are not powerless here. Some methods that often help:

• Written agreements: Get commitments in writing with timelines.
• Public reporting: Share progress reports with students on big promises.
• Student consultation: Run surveys, town halls, or focus groups, and share the results widely.
• Coalition backing: Present proposals alongside multiple student groups.

If a promise exists only in a friendly conversation, it will probably evaporate when people change roles.

You are allowed to be both cooperative and firm. You are not there to be an unpaid marketing team.

Student Government vs Activism vs Building Things

If you are into startups, projects, or movements, you have a choice: do you work inside formal structures, outside them, or both?

What Student Government Is Good At

Student government is helpful when you need:

• Official recognition (e.g., new policy, new service, representation on a committee).
• Stable funding for ongoing programs.
• Legitimacy to speak for a broad group in meetings.

It is slower but gives things a more permanent shape.

What Activism and Direct Organizing Are Good At

Activist groups, protests, petitions, and direct campaigns are helpful when you need:

• Urgent attention on neglected issues.
• Pressure when official channels stall or ignore students.
• Freedom from the constraints of rules and gradualism.

They can be fast and loud, but they may not always secure stable policy changes without some formal follow-up.

What Building Projects Is Good At

Founders and builders sometimes underestimate how political their work can be. New projects can:

• Fill gaps the campus has ignored (like maker spaces, peer mentoring, or founder communities).
• Show admins and governments that better models are possible.
• Create independent centers of power (data, networks, skills).

Sometimes the most effective “political” move is to quietly build the thing that proves everyone wrong.

If you are a builder, you might choose to stay adjacent to student government: friendly, informed, but not absorbed into it.

Ethical Tensions You Will Actually Feel

This is where many student leaders get stuck. Not in the rules, but in the small moral dilemmas:

Representation vs Expertise

You might be elected by 2,000 students who never read a policy document. Then you sit in a room with admin who have been doing this for 15 years.

Whose judgment do you trust when they disagree?

A few guidelines:

• Gather student input on key questions, not on every minor detail.
• Be transparent about when you followed majority views and when you followed expert advice.
• Document your reasoning so you can explain it calmly later.

Activist Pressure vs Process Limits

Activist groups will often ask for faster, stronger action than the rules or budget allow. Saying “no” or “not like that” can feel like betrayal.

But if you ignore process limits entirely:

• Decisions can be reversed easily by admin or higher-level bodies.
• You risk sanctions that hurt future students more than they hurt current admin.

It is not about always choosing process over pressure. It is about being precise: “This tactic might get quick attention but destroy this long-term project we are working on. Is that tradeoff worth it?”

Friendship vs Accountability

Student government often becomes a friend circle. That can be nice, until someone in that circle:

• Misuses funds.
• Harasses another member.
• Leaks sensitive information for personal gain.

Then you are forced to choose: protect a friend or protect the integrity of the role.

If your group cannot hold its own members accountable, admin and students will stop taking it seriously.

You will not always get this right. But being aware of the tension makes you less likely to sleepwalk through it.

Practical Skills That Make Campus Politics Less Chaotic

There are a few concrete skills that make everything easier, and they carry over to startups and careers.

Basic Policy Writing

You do not need to write legal texts. You just need clear structure. A simple pattern for a proposal:

• Title: One sentence: “Proposal for X.”
• Problem: Short description, with 1-2 data points or examples.
• Proposal: What exactly should change, who would do it, and on what rough timeline.
• Impact: Who benefits, any foreseen costs or risks.
• Consultation: Who you spoke with while drafting.

If you can write that clearly, people will take you more seriously, even if they disagree.

Reading Budgets Without Panic

Budgets look scary, but they mostly answer three questions:

• Where does the money come from?
• Where is it going?
• What changed compared to last year?

When you see a budget:

• Scan for big percentages, not tiny line items.
• Ask why certain areas grew or shrank.
• Look for “reserves” or unallocated funds; those sometimes matter more than anything else.

If you can read a basic budget, you will be one of the few students in the room who actually know where power flows.

Communication That Does Not Waste People’s Time

Many people stop reading after the first few lines of an email or post. Respect that:

• Start with the key point: “We are voting on X and your input is needed.”
• Use headings and short paragraphs, even in emails.
• Provide a clear “what you can do next” section.

Good communication is not decoration. It is how you move from talk to action.

Knowing When To Walk Away (Or Not Enter At All)

There is a strange romanticism about being “in the arena,” as if any participation is automatically noble. That is not always true.

You might be taking a bad approach if:

• You are joining student government mostly because you feel guilty for not “doing enough.”
• You see it as a guaranteed stepping stone to career success, rather than one of many paths.
• You are ignoring your existing commitments that already create value (research, startups, clubs) to chase titles.

Saying “no” to student government can be just as strategic as saying “yes.”

On the other hand, if you find yourself constantly complaining about campus decisions but never entering any room where they are made, that might also be a sign. Participation is not mandatory, but it is available.

The biggest shift happens when you stop seeing campus politics as a show you watch and start seeing it as a set of systems you can learn, question, and sometimes rewire. Not magically. Not instantly. But step by step, with other students who are also just trying to understand how power works before they graduate into a larger, stranger version of the same game.